News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by yackob03 on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @10:33AM (#6367372)
They will also be less likely to attract future contractors.
Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by ksmiley on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @10:37AM (#6367407)
Playing the devil's advocate here: if contractors self-select themselves out of being hired because they're not sure they can get the job done, then all the better! The remaining applicant pool will be stronger on average.
Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by r00fus on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @10:47AM (#6367480)
No the applicant pool will be more bullish. In many cases that might mean weaker (i.e., unable to estimate work effort properly).
Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by comrade_ogilvy on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @07:50PM (#6371007)
They may be stronger, or maybe not. They certainly will learn to inflate the price to include lawyers fees.

Are you hiring a contractor to get work done? Or are you allowing the head of your legal department to pad his resume, while your department is paying for many in house lawyer hours plus (via the contract) many out of house lawyer hours?

Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by niuzeta on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @10:49AM (#6367493)
seconded. I wouldn't even have to quote Machiavelli to say that it's important to show your future contractors(or your peers) what you are capable of, to force them to think twice before arranging anything with you.

Will it reduce the number of incoming contractors? Probably. Will the contractors who'll still chime in be more likely reliable, after considering what they're agreeing with? Very likely.

Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by mindcrime on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @11:10AM (#6367647)
Probably. Will the contractors who'll still chime in be more likely reliable, after considering what they're agreeing with?

I doubt it. They're just as likely to be selecting for future contractors who are overly confident / cocky by nature, and/or ones who don't understand how to estimate software projects, and who don't have a good feel/understanding for the risks involved.

Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by darkarmani on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @04:30PM (#6369821)
> Will it reduce the number of incoming contractors? Probably. Will the contractors who'll still chime in be more likely reliable, after considering what they're agreeing with? Very likely.

Wouldn't it more likely select contractors that have good liability shields and get to charge a premium for working for an asshole company because there are less people willing to do the work? This is how patent trolls are set up with no assets to lose.

Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by slantyyz on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @11:57AM (#6367958)
This is only true if the job market is a seller's market. If it's a buyer's market, it only prevents the smarter ones from wanting to work with that type of company.