News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by niuzeta on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @10:49AM (#6367493)
seconded. I wouldn't even have to quote Machiavelli to say that it's important to show your future contractors(or your peers) what you are capable of, to force them to think twice before arranging anything with you.

Will it reduce the number of incoming contractors? Probably. Will the contractors who'll still chime in be more likely reliable, after considering what they're agreeing with? Very likely.

Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by mindcrime on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @11:10AM (#6367647)
Probably. Will the contractors who'll still chime in be more likely reliable, after considering what they're agreeing with?

I doubt it. They're just as likely to be selecting for future contractors who are overly confident / cocky by nature, and/or ones who don't understand how to estimate software projects, and who don't have a good feel/understanding for the risks involved.

Re:Fucking Sue Me (2011) by darkarmani on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @04:30PM (#6369821)
> Will it reduce the number of incoming contractors? Probably. Will the contractors who'll still chime in be more likely reliable, after considering what they're agreeing with? Very likely.

Wouldn't it more likely select contractors that have good liability shields and get to charge a premium for working for an asshole company because there are less people willing to do the work? This is how patent trolls are set up with no assets to lose.