Re:Vietnam Internet restrictions come into effect
by gizmo686 on Sunday September 01, 2013 @08:59PM
(#6312922)
I do not want to enter into a discussion about the morality of child porn. However, regardless of you view on that, it is still a form of speech. US legal precedent explicitly allows for the limitations of speech under specific circumstances (such as intent and likelyhood to incite a crime, and malice with a reckless disregard to the truth). What is important to remember is that wheather we are censoring terrorist how-tos, child-porn, or political opponents we are still limiting speach.
Re:Vietnam Internet restrictions come into effect
by rdl on Sunday September 01, 2013 @08:51PM
(#6312897)
Child pornography doesn't have a bright line, though. I don't think 16/18/21 are particularly different (I.e. societies could choose any of those). There still seems to be debate around the edges of simulated, simulated using real photos of non sexual underage people, self pics to other minors, etc. And IMO the bigger issue of knowing possession vs. it being totally radioactive.
Re:Vietnam Internet restrictions come into effect
by gizmo686 on Sunday September 01, 2013 @09:02PM
(#6312929)
>There still seems to be debate around the edges of simulated
Not just the edges. I've seen porn sites self censor obvious fictional porn depicting children, because of concern over hosting child porn.
There needs to be rules, but they need to be sensible and not limit speech. The other side of that coin though is the laws against copyrighted material, most people don't care and download stuff illegally anyway.
I can't imagine lawmakers backing away from the Internet, and I don't really want them to because before you know it someone would be monetising child porn. No idea how you would even begin to solve the problem of balance though.