Re:Bradley Manning's Post-Sentencing Statement
by graycat on Wednesday August 21, 2013 @09:50PM
(#6254608)
One view of the military recruiting
teenagers is that the military
exploits the fact that a large
fraction of teenagers are really
eager to belong to something.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bradley Manning's Post-Sentencing Statement
by anigbrowl on Thursday August 22, 2013 @12:35AM
(#6255194)
If that's your argument, then we shouldn't trust them with the ability to vote, enter into contracts, or get married.
Re:Bradley Manning's Post-Sentencing Statement
by praptak on Thursday August 22, 2013 @03:56AM
(#6255764)
Only if we start from the premise that there is no middle ground between totally infallible and too stupid to take any responsibility.
Re:Bradley Manning's Post-Sentencing Statement
by graycat on Thursday August 22, 2013 @08:38AM
(#6256708)
I meant teenage boys. Okay, you have a
really nice daughter, cute, sweet, pretty, darling,
adorable, precious, a girl you have never
been able to say "No" to, who has had you
wrapped around her little finger since she
was six months old, great student, cooks,
sews, plays piano, great babysitter, loves
kids, popular, etc. and at 16 falls in love
with a boy 18 and wants to get married.
You "trust" him with your daughter?
That little scenario aside, the claim in my statement is that the military doesn't just use the strong desire of teenage boys to be members of groups but exploits it. The exploitation is in basic training, etc.
It's a manipulation.
For voting, entering into contracts, and usually even marriage, the role of manipulation is usually much lower and the consequences less deadly.