Re:Our liability as Twitter app developers
by ceejayoz on Monday August 19, 2013 @11:39AM
(#6237808)
> Contrast with Facebook which has a much better implementation of finely grained permissions where you can opt to only ask for the permissions your application needed.
Facebook's minimum level of permissions is still infuriatingly broad. I hate getting "why do you need my friends list and public profile?!" feedback on our Facebook apps. If I could opt out of them, I would - often, I just want your FB ID and e-mail!
Re:Our liability as Twitter app developers
by NieyooG8 on Monday August 19, 2013 @12:41PM
(#6238152)
You could just ask for them.
Contrast with Facebook which has a much better implementation of finely grained permissions where you can opt to only ask for the permissions your application needed.
In the end, we switched to asking for read-only permissions for most users and let them upgrade to read-write the first time they wanted to perform a Twitter-write operation. This was a hassle from an engineering point of view but did completely eliminate complains about us asking for too much access: http://lanyrd.com/blog/2012/twitter-read-only/
We eventually moved to our own social graph, which eliminated the need to update Twitter's graph from our interface entirely.