Re:Detaining my partner: a failed attempt at intimidation
by anigbrowl on Sunday August 18, 2013 @04:04PM
(#6233986)
As I've said before, you won't see any review of this until after troops are fully withdrawn from Afghanistan, at which point a review of the AUMF and Patriot act become far more likely.
Re:Detaining my partner: a failed attempt at intimidation
by straight_talk_2 on Sunday August 18, 2013 @03:46PM
(#6233897)
Are you really that naive as to expect change under the next democrat|republican administrations?
Re:Detaining my partner: a failed attempt at intimidation
by mythz on Sunday August 18, 2013 @03:58PM
(#6233950)
You've confused hope with naivety, where there is none.
Election time is the best time for reform, i.e. where the democratic process has the most influence.
Re:Detaining my partner: a failed attempt at intimidation
by jacquesm on Sunday August 18, 2013 @05:25PM
(#6234305)
Wasn't Obama the 'hope' candidate?
I agree that hope is better than despair but hope seems to be a bit of a tarnished word after the last 4+ years.
Re:Detaining my partner: a failed attempt at intimidation
by ams6110 on Sunday August 18, 2013 @04:29PM
(#6234092)
And this time around, let's hope we are a bit more curious about the "change" we are voting for.
Re:Detaining my partner: a failed attempt at intimidation
by straight_talk_2 on Sunday August 18, 2013 @06:15PM
(#6234505)
Voting for a very small set of preselected candidates, endorsed by either wing of the elite party and mass media has zero chance of changing anything.
The one thing that is clear is that we shouldn't expect change under an Obama administration.