News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lavabit.com owner: 'I could be arrested' for resisting su... by anologwintermut on Friday August 16, 2013 @11:21AM (#6224502)
Seeing as Lavabit handled encryption and decryption server side, the order could have required them to retain messages after decryption. Or, less insidiously, just required them to retain messages they received prior to encrypting them. In both cases, they wouldn't have forced Lavabit to put in a backdoor, just keep what they had already. (though if they only stored decrypted emails in memory, that distinction is small).

Remember, Lavabit voluntarily complied with other court orders, so they likely have the technical means to comply with what the feds want.

Re:Lavabit.com owner: 'I could be arrested' for resisting su... by thecodeore on Friday August 16, 2013 @11:51AM (#6224741)
You have no idea what the feds want, and the previous "comply" was probably just turning over the information it had readily available including the raw cipher text which would be useless with out the key

I do not believe for a second the NSA was looking simliar information.

Re:Lavabit.com owner: 'I could be arrested' for resisting su... by werid on Friday August 16, 2013 @12:08PM (#6224881)
those "other court orders" could have been for accounts that were not encrypted, like the free accounts.