How the U.S. and Its Allies Got Stuck with the World’s Worst New Warplane

Re:How the U.S. and Its Allies Got Stuck with the World’s Wo... by antubbs on Wednesday August 14, 2013 @09:31AM (#6211337)

I don't believe this is accurate.

The F-16 is the "low" part of the "high/low" multirole fighter strategy. For the air force, the "high" jet is the F-15. The F-22 is predominantly designed for air superiority, and thus is most directly a replacement for the F-15C. Whether it really even replaces the F-15C is questionable, since the quantity produced is extremely small compared to the overall legacy fighter fleet.

The assumption is that gap will be filled by the F-35 and the F-16 will be replaced by the F-35.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How the U.S. and Its Allies Got Stuck with the World’s Wo... by dkhenry on Wednesday August 14, 2013 @10:43AM (#6211773)

I thought it was F-16 as the high fighter and the F-18 as the low fighter ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How the U.S. and Its Allies Got Stuck with the World’s Wo... by zokier on Wednesday August 14, 2013 @11:21AM (#6212039)

Nope. F-16 and F-18 are of comparable class, F-18 being built for Navy requirements and F-16 for Air Force. IIRC they even evolved from a common program at one point. They separated as Navy and AF do not mix well, as is demonstrated by the JSF program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_Fighter_program

[ Parent | on HN ]