Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by hamburglar on Friday August 09, 2013 @03:51AM
(#6184263)
Hard to say what their infrastructure costs are, but just salaries for 178 employees is way more than $13MM.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by boyter on Friday August 09, 2013 @04:17AM
(#6184335)
The real question being why did they have 178 employees?
It sounds almost like they were following the Digg engineering approach rather then Reddit's.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by citricsquid on Friday August 09, 2013 @04:20AM
(#6184343)
http://www.linkedin.com/vsearch/p?f_CC=1668979
A lot of "brand strategists"
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by adventured on Friday August 09, 2013 @04:31AM
(#6184386)
The number of people with "brand" in their title is amazing.
Is that a fancy title for someone who interacts with the tumblr community? I noticed they're located all over the place.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by toble on Friday August 09, 2013 @05:41AM
(#6184634)
In ad sales lingo, 'brand' is pay per view or sponsorship advertising. These people will be looking after the big clients, think music labels, movie studios, TV networks...
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by Brajeshwar on Friday August 09, 2013 @05:30AM
(#6184591)
Hey, do you have a link/url to the Reddit's Engineering Approach article/post. I'd very much like to read it. Thanks.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by boyter on Saturday August 10, 2013 @12:26AM
(#6190054)
Sorry I don't. That comment was based on knowing the history of both of them. I believe that Digg had something like 80 employees vs reddit's 5 or so. That's based on from memory. Interviews with Owen Byrne (Mixergy), Kevin Rose (I think it was mentioned on TWiT when he was on), and places like HighScalibility are where I got those basic numbers.
I wish I could point you at some better sources but that's the best I can remember sorry.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by ScottWhigham on Friday August 09, 2013 @05:04AM
(#6184488)
I'm not sure how to guesstimate salary costs but $13MM/178 = $73,000 per year per employee. Paying $73,000 per year means that you are paying salary, payroll taxes, and any benefits. The actual salary, for example, might be $55,000 with ~$10,000 tacked on for payroll taxes and another ~$8000 in various benefits/costs.
An average salary of $55,000 seems a bit low but not by too much. I'd guess that $13m is right around their employee cost. If that's true, the rest of their cash must be funneled towards tech and advertising.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by insaneirish on Friday August 09, 2013 @06:06AM
(#6184710)
Not sure what the breakdown would have been for technical vs. non-technical people, but $55,000/year in New York City (where Tumblr is) is a pittance. You'd be lucky to hire a decent programmer in New York for under $100,000.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by fatjokes on Friday August 09, 2013 @09:38AM
(#6185511)
$55k at a mature startup like Tumblr would be an insult to a good programmer, who is being flooded with six-fig offers from hedge funds and banks. In NYC, it's almost about what a grad student who interns in the summer would gross in a year.
Re:What would have happened to Tumblr without Yahoo? Trouble
by ScottWhigham on Saturday August 10, 2013 @06:17PM
(#6192884)
I'm guessing that we have different assumptions as to what the 178 people employed there do. Instead of having 178 programmers (thus skewing my original guess), I would expect that a company like Tumbler has probably 50-75 "tech" people (programmers, sysadmins) with the balance being either management or lower level people (brand awareness folks, customer service, assistants, etc). There are going to be fewer management people than others, which means the bulk of their 178 employees in my guess would be lower-level employees. I'm curious to think why you guys think they have most/all of their employees as programmers/devs...