Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by stkrzysiak on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:32PM
(#6182094)
That's why I switched to gmail and rot13.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by wcfields on Thursday August 08, 2013 @06:11PM
(#6182319)
Could explain all the advertisements for Hooked on Phonics.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by Osaka on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:51PM
(#6182201)
Could you explain how rot13 helps?
"The algorithm provides virtually no cryptographic security..." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROT13
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by jarrett on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:53PM
(#6182217)
I believe it was meant ironically. Similar to the joke "I double rot13 all my emails, but I'm probably just being paranoid." (If you're not familiar with rot13, running it twice results in the original plaintext.)
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by mynameishere on Thursday August 08, 2013 @06:51PM
(#6182534)
It's a joke, but at the same time, I doubt the pattern-recognition bots correct for it, so it would likely have some effect security-wise, to the same extent you get by spelling 'shit' as 'sh|t'.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by MartinCron on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:53PM
(#6182213)
Once you explain a joke, it's not funny anymore.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by ars on Thursday August 08, 2013 @07:19PM
(#6182665)
A joke, maybe. But explaining terminology doesn't [usually] hurt a joke.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by Osaka on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:57PM
(#6182240)
Merci
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by h0w412d on Thursday August 08, 2013 @06:26PM
(#6182406)
"virtually"...being kinda generous, aren't we?
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by mpyne on Thursday August 08, 2013 @09:02PM
(#6183051)
Honestly GMail is perfect for the threat model of the mails I use it for.
It's very well-defended against random leakage across the Internet, against hacking attacks, etc.
The government has an easier time of getting access to it if I piss them off, but if I do piss them off enough they can essentially invent bad stuff regarding me anyways, and I'm screwed no matter what. Once I came into karmic balance with that I accepted it and went on with my life.
Of course, what's good for me is not necessarily what's good for you.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by dutchbrit on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:57PM
(#6182237)
You should use base_64 instead, that's what all the cool kids use.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by dictum on Thursday August 08, 2013 @06:20PM
(#6182365)
ROT13 is ready for enterprise.
Re:Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds (2007)
by tlrobinson on Thursday August 08, 2013 @06:52PM
(#6182536)
No no, enterprise requires double ROT13.