News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by onli on Thursday August 08, 2013 @03:33PM (#6181246)
And this reads as if someone was trying to force him to install means to spy on his users, and it wouldn't be surprising if the aim was to spy on Snowden directly (if he really used this service).
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by raganwald on Thursday August 08, 2013 @03:37PM (#6181290)
It may be simpler than that. Even if Snowden has walked away from this service, the publicity may have attracted a lot of people the authorities find interesting, including legitimate (whatever that means) persons of interest.
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by toyg on Thursday August 08, 2013 @04:24PM (#6181637)
The political backlash attached to slapping an NSL on "Snowden's email provider" would have looked obvious to a 5-year-old, and any real player worth its salt would have run from Lavabit as soon as it hit the news.

No, this has nothing to do with common criminals and everything to do with Snowden.

Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by ptwiggens on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:32PM (#6182087)
NSL's come with a gag order. There wouldn't have been any backlash as no one would have known about it.

He shut it down because that was the only way to legally prevent the government from spying on his users.

Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by 001sky on Thursday August 08, 2013 @06:11PM (#6182316)
Good point. While controversial, this is exactly why, too. (Fed's don't want to tip their hand).
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by jaekwon on Friday August 09, 2013 @02:39AM (#6184077)
Haven't NSL gag orders been found unconstitutional?

http://securitywatch.pcmag.com/privacy/309277-judge-says-fbi...

I wonder why he didn't challenge it.

Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by kaonashi on Friday August 09, 2013 @04:54AM (#6184458)
Because challenging it from a solitary confinement cell might not sound that appealing.
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by toyg on Friday August 09, 2013 @01:49AM (#6183957)
Somebody running a service like Lavabit woild be a very motivated individual, civil disobedience was a real risk.
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by jlgreco on Thursday August 08, 2013 @04:30PM (#6181672)
Didn't Italy nail a mob boss a few years ago because they were using a common substitution cipher?
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by pchristensen on Thursday August 08, 2013 @04:41PM (#6181740)
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by jlgreco on Thursday August 08, 2013 @04:49PM (#6181797)
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by deftnerd on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:00PM (#6181876)
What I find interesting is that the lavabit homepage says that the owner has been fighting this for 6 weeks, but the reporter that released Snowden's email address did it July 13th.

The Government has been trying to get into Lavabit longer than that.

Although, perhaps they already knew that Snowden was using Lavabit and started the process immediately after his flight to HK.

Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by tlrobinson on Thursday August 08, 2013 @05:13PM (#6181964)
His Lavabit address has been in PGP key servers since April: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x4DB8A...
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by MagicWishMonkey on Thursday August 08, 2013 @11:51PM (#6183649)
That's exactly what happened. He can't afford to continue fighting the feds in court, so he's shutting everything down. His lawyer is expensive and he will go bankrupt if he stays the course.

If anyone can recommend someone who can provide counsel pro-bono let me know and I'll forward the message along.

Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by res0nat0r on Thursday August 08, 2013 @03:47PM (#6181364)
More likely he was compelled to turn over emails relating to the case, and he doesn't want to have to be forced to do that again, so he's shutting down the service.
Re:Lavabit abruptly shuts down by onli on Thursday August 08, 2013 @03:56PM (#6181435)
Possible, but unlikely given the nature of the service. It sounded like he wouldn't have been able to do that.