It's not that you could never prove Creationism wrong, it's that faith is not required to be proven. That's why it is called faith. People who believe in God are going to believe in God, even if you could irrefutably prove beyond any doubt that (a) evolutionary theory is correct and (b) God doesn't exist.
You'd still have failed to prove it in their "heart", or wherever pure, unadulterated illogicality happens to live.
http://www.ridgecrest.ca.us/~do_while/sage/v1i4f.htm
Some people who have normally shunned the entire concept of the evolution theory in the past have now integrated micro-evolution into their belief systems yet vehemently oppose macro-evolution.
No matter which path you take (creationism vs evolution), I guess it's just turtles all the way down. ;)
This is incorrect. With creationism/ID, it is expected that you do not question the nature of the creator/designer beyond what information is provided in texts or by religious/ideological leaders. With evolution, the principles are based on math and chemistry, which is in turn based on physics, which is currently being probed down to the smallest scales possible. (Contrary to what you might have been told, there is a lower limit to physics.)
I agree. But...
There is no limit to the determination of people defending their beliefs against any theory for which science provides evidence.
Creationista Lisp v1.0
CL-BELIEVER> (= evidence truth)
nil
Part of the sick beauty of Creationism is that there's no way to prove it wrong (though I'd argue that's largely because it's based on no real facts in the first place)