News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Darwin validated: Missing link found by jballanc on Wednesday May 20, 2009 @01:15AM (#618135)
No matter which path you take (creationism vs evolution), I guess it's just turtles all the way down.

This is incorrect. With creationism/ID, it is expected that you do not question the nature of the creator/designer beyond what information is provided in texts or by religious/ideological leaders. With evolution, the principles are based on math and chemistry, which is in turn based on physics, which is currently being probed down to the smallest scales possible. (Contrary to what you might have been told, there is a lower limit to physics.)

Re:Darwin validated: Missing link found by twoz on Wednesday May 20, 2009 @11:34AM (#618704)
Contrary to what you might have been told, there is a lower limit to physics.

I agree. But...

There is no limit to the determination of people defending their beliefs against any theory for which science provides evidence.

    Creationista Lisp v1.0

    CL-BELIEVER> (= evidence truth)
    nil
Re:Darwin validated: Missing link found by petercollins on Wednesday May 20, 2009 @02:31PM (#619036)
Yeehaa. And their beliefs reside in yesterday's rubbish - and always will until the new order comes.