For me, they are really good on the low end. I love the fact that they offer a $5 per month instance size. Plus, since I joined during the beta period I get unlimited bandwidth for free. This beats the $15 per month AWS instance sizes or the lowest Google option of like $30 bucks. Also, it's like 2x faster than AWS. Finally, for hacking you can easily use a $5 server to replace a service like Cloudant as your backend during testing. I've had cases where I would have been charged hundreds of dollars for API calls which a $5 DigitalOcean server handled marvelously. Or you can use it host a high performance blog: http://jasonormand.com/2012/07/20/introducing-lempress-super...
I thought the unlimited bandwidth thing was only until they start measuring it?
Re:DigitalOcean raises $3.2M Seed Round
by jeffasinger on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @04:53PM
(#6175548)
I think customers that signed up a long time ago get unlimited bandwidth forever so long as they don't do certain things (Tor, Bittorents, run a CDN)
Re:DigitalOcean raises $3.2M Seed Round
by ampsonic on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @04:41PM
(#6175473)
Correct
Re:DigitalOcean raises $3.2M Seed Round
by toomuchtodo on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @07:13PM
(#6176300)
Why would I take reserved instances into account when I don't have to reserve them with Digital Ocean? They're still kicking AWS' ass on pricing. Sure, big boys are still going to go with AWS (i.e. the CIA), but for small/mid-sized shops? Digital Ocean ahoy!
This is not to run down DigitalOcean, but if you take reserved instances into account then they don't necessarily beat EC2 pricing. Or am I missing something?