News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by deadreturns3 on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @10:10PM (#6170411)
Am justing waiting for them to implement "await".
Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by Permit on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @10:16PM (#6170425)
I think you might be waiting for awhile unfortunately. Implementing await would result in a lot of autogenerated code. Typescript is largely meant to be almost 1:1 with the Javascript it produces.

Anders talks about that problem in this video: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2013/9-006

Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by omphalos on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @07:20AM (#6172014)
One proposed alternative to await (for CoffeeScript) that is more one-to-one with the generated JavaScript: https://github.com/jashkenas/coffee-script/issues/2762
Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by yareally on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @05:17AM (#6171679)
There's also a discussion[1] at Codeplex on some TypeScript compatible alternatives to async/await.

[1] http://typescript.codeplex.com/discussions/397594

Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by CmonDev on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @04:18AM (#6171505)
Awaiting for awhile? Awful.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by jeswin on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @11:02PM (#6170559)
That would result in future incompatibility, considering ES6 has generators which could do the same job.

edit: just the points

Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by CmonDev on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @04:19AM (#6171512)
We will care about this in 2050 - when ES6 gets released.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1 by itsmonktastic on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @08:43AM (#6172372)
FWIW await is in the Roadmap for 1.x http://typescript.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Roadmap