Why Mark Shuttleworth is important to desktop Linux

Re:Why Mark Shuttleworth is important to desktop Linux by Shorel on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:13AM (#6146971)

I have tried it, it just takes a week to install, while Ubuntu takes some hours (I test several configurations until I'm happy with one).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Shuttleworth is important to desktop Linux by jb17 on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:34AM (#6147107)

How did it take you weeks to install? You basically just extract a small archive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Shuttleworth is important to desktop Linux by Shorel on Friday August 02, 2013 @11:33AM (#6147558)

Then you set some env vars, compile a bunch of applications for hours and then realize that your env vars were wrong or you want to change them for some reason and you have to start compiling all over again.

Unless you want some console-only LFS. But that's not me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Shuttleworth is important to desktop Linux by korethr on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:54AM (#6147250)

I'm confident that that was hyperbole, but the overall idea is not wrong. It takes much less time to install a pre-compiled binary from a .deb or .rpm file than it does to configure and compile source code, even if you have an especially powerful CPU to hand. Why? Your distro has already done the hard work of configuring and compiling for you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Shuttleworth is important to desktop Linux by Shish2k on Friday August 02, 2013 @12:35PM (#6147997)

libc alone took ~48 hours on my P2-266 with 32MB RAM...

(My gentoo experience may be somewhat out of date)

[ Parent | on HN ]