A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Microsoft web sites

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by shanselman on Friday August 02, 2013 @02:52AM (#6145675)

Respectfully, that's nonsense. I don't even work in their department. I've been online for 20+ years, blogging for like 12 years and I've worked at MS for 6.

The blog is a blog. This post is just a post. I get in trouble for blogging a few times a year, and that suits me just fine. It's just a job.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by test-it on Friday August 02, 2013 @04:43AM (#6145952)

Wow, Mr Hanselman himself.

I'm a big fan - listen to all episodes of your podcast. Just watched a few presentations from this year Build. You should really give other MS employees a course on public speaking - they are sooo slow and boring compared to you ;-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by scrabble on Friday August 02, 2013 @11:26AM (#6147515)

He's got a course on public speaking available on TekPub.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by taspeotis on Friday August 02, 2013 @04:11AM (#6145878)

OT, but do you think you could point me in the direction of whoever's responsible for WPL/AntiXSS? It's been broken for ages [1] [2]. There seem to be no reliable HTML sanitization library for .NET right now. It looks like the best I could do is to copy and paste a bunch of code and hope that it works [3].

[1] http://wpl.codeplex.com/releases/view/80289#ReviewsAnchor

[2] http://wpl.codeplex.com/workitem/17246

[3] http://eksith.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/whitelist-santize-htm...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by shanselman on Friday August 02, 2013 @07:14PM (#6150251)

Let me ask around. It's handled by a group that isn't ASP.NET.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by taspeotis on Friday August 02, 2013 @08:33PM (#6150509)

Any effort is appreciated. Thank you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by tinco on Friday August 02, 2013 @04:41AM (#6145949)

Thank you for your blog, the posts are always entertaining and informative :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by yuhong on Friday August 02, 2013 @03:33AM (#6145777)

OT, but on the .NET Framework versioning, the support lifecycle of 2.0/3.0/3.5 is a mess that needs to be cleaned up:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2696944

The lifecycle policy of 3.5 SP1 should also be applied to 3.0 SP2 and 2.0 SP2, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by jamshedd on Monday August 05, 2013 @09:32PM (#6164342)

Thanks for the feedback Yuhong. As you correctly pointed out .NET 2.0 SP2 and .NET 3.0 SP2 are sub-components of .NET 3.5 SP1 so it makes sense to have these on the same lifecycle. The good news is that this is already the case, the Knowledge Base Article 2696944 clarifies that when .NET 3.5 SP1 is installed the same lifecycle will apply to .NET 2.0 SP2 and 3.0 SP2 too.

This is the relevant snippet from that KB article -

...snip...

However, Microsoft will provide support for the .NET Framework 2.0 and .NET Framework 3.0 components for customers who install the .NET Framework 3.5 for as long as the .NET Framework 3.5 remains in support.

...snip...

Thanks, Jamshed Program Manager, .NET Framework Fundamentals team

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by yuhong on Monday August 05, 2013 @10:01PM (#6164434)

But why 2.0 SP2 and 3.0 SP2 has a different lifecycle if 3.5 SP1 is installed vs if it is not installed?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A rich new JavaScript code editor spreading to several Mi... by shanselman on Friday August 02, 2013 @07:13PM (#6150249)

Thanks, I've sent this note to the Lifecycle guy and I'll get you a response.

[ Parent | on HN ]