News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A year without food (2012) by solarmist on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @09:25PM (#6131281)
They mention "Some five years later, he had regained only 7 kilograms", so it seems they had a least one follow up and I assume if he were permanently harmed by this they would've mentioned it as a caution.
Re:A year without food (2012) by spdub on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @01:54AM (#6132114)
Although I agree with you, this is hardly a scientistic journal.
Re:A year without food (2012) by solarmist on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @04:18AM (#6132458)
Of course not, but catastrophic results make exciting "news".