News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A year without food (2012) by alphaoverlord on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @08:48PM (#6131143)
There are significant risks to such an experiment, and it's a shame that there isn't any record of what happened to him after the fact or his long term health.

There is a significant body of literature suggests that in addition to risks during starvation, there is significant harm and danger in trying to eat again [1]. The GI tract atrophies (much like when we don't use a muscle or a limb for a long time with a neurological disorder), and there are many metabolic complications in restarting to eat.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refeeding_syndrome

Re:A year without food (2012) by solarmist on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @09:25PM (#6131281)
They mention "Some five years later, he had regained only 7 kilograms", so it seems they had a least one follow up and I assume if he were permanently harmed by this they would've mentioned it as a caution.
Re:A year without food (2012) by spdub on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @01:54AM (#6132114)
Although I agree with you, this is hardly a scientistic journal.
Re:A year without food (2012) by solarmist on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @04:18AM (#6132458)
Of course not, but catastrophic results make exciting "news".
Re:A year without food (2012) by gems on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @01:58PM (#6135602)
Rapid weight loss is known to cause gallstones. That's what happened to me and it was awful! It's not a minor issue. It can interrupt your day, cause you pain, and prevent you from working or sleeping for more than 10 hours if you don't eat the right foods.
Re:A year without food (2012) by jfoutz on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @01:09AM (#6132028)
I wonder if it's easier on people under constant medical supervision than it is for prisoners of war.