Re:Chomsky praises Snowden and condemns US hypocrisy
by vdaniuk on Sunday July 28, 2013 @04:44PM
(#6118048)
I have no opinion on Chomsky as I am not really acquainted with his works. However, I was interested in him and trying to get some sort of minority opinion on Chomsky I decided to investigate your links.
My conclusion is based on this great quote: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof". I have seen zero citations, links or verifiable research on the pages, so for the time being I will use more conventional facts about Chomsky.
Re:Chomsky praises Snowden and condemns US hypocrisy
by lukifer on Sunday July 28, 2013 @05:55PM
(#6118229)
I agree with the principle of "extraordinary proof", but in practice, what qualifies as extraordinary is highly subjective. To a Creationist, spontaneous generation of life is extraordinary. To a Truther, the buildings falling due to fire alone is extraordinary, etc.
I prefer the idea that an extraordinary amount of certainty requires extraordinary proof. Skepticism should be the default position.
Re:Chomsky praises Snowden and condemns US hypocrisy
by recusancy on Sunday July 28, 2013 @04:42PM
(#6118041)
Oh good. Trutherism and NWO conspiracies.
[deleted]
Re:Chomsky praises Snowden and condemns US hypocrisy
by WayneDB on Sunday July 28, 2013 @03:25PM
(#6117752)
Sorry...what does colloidal silver have to do with it?
Did you read the author's bio? He's no slouch - Yale grad, litigator with experience in the Supreme Court, writes for HuffPo...but I guess we should write it off immediately because...colloidal silver? You tell me because I don't know anything about colloidal silver.
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/noamchomskygatekepper26sep05....
https://startpage.com/do/search?query=chomsky+gatekeeper
Bio of the author of the first article - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-abrahamson
(Has the mention of this simple possibility offended you? If you think it's impossible, tell me why.)