Re:Google will pay for free wireless in S.F. parks
by yapcguy on Thursday July 25, 2013 @09:43PM
(#6106135)
Google is a serial offender when it comes to privacy violations. Not really different from big banks who are caught committing fraud but always manage to settle with a big wad of cash, without having to admit any guilt whatsoever.
Re:Google will pay for free wireless in S.F. parks
by gbin on Friday July 26, 2013 @04:11AM
(#6107132)
Comparing Google ethics to banks ethics.
sorry you said wat?!
I worked for at a credit bank and I am still shocked at how immoral my coworkers were... I mean there was no limit : racist discrimination with the first name to calculate a risk on a consumer credit ? checked. Intentionally put people under with credit, anticipating the fact and be first to recollect ? checked.
At Google, from day one if you remember one thing they tell you : You never mess with private data ever.
Google then: * Acknowledged the problem and apologized * Stated that the workaround was meant to be used for their "+1" buttons and such, but not for advertisements * Stopped giving out these cookies for advertisements on Safari * Was sued by the FCC for $22 million * Is now being sued by consumers on nebulous grounds
If you accept the claim that it was an accident to begin with, I don't see that Google did anything wrong.
[1] http://mashable.com/2013/01/25/google-safari-tracking-lawsui...