News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Leaked Samsung exFat driver relicensed as GPL by icebraining on Tuesday July 23, 2013 @07:19AM (#6089302)
Even if you don't want to play along with copyright laws - and I can perfectly understand why one wouldn't - that's not a reason to deceive people by claiming the code to be GPL licensed and make them liable if they redistribute it.

If one wants to say "fuck copyright", putting a copyright license in the code is not the really the most appropriate way.

Re:Leaked Samsung exFat driver relicensed as GPL by scotty79 on Tuesday July 23, 2013 @09:38AM (#6089903)
I think deception is a valid tool for creating chaos and chaos is a valid tool for bringing down systems.