Re:Leaked Samsung exFat driver relicensed as GPL
by icebraining on Tuesday July 23, 2013 @07:19AM
(#6089302)
Even if you don't want to play along with copyright laws - and I can perfectly understand why one wouldn't - that's not a reason to deceive people by claiming the code to be GPL licensed and make them liable if they redistribute it.
If one wants to say "fuck copyright", putting a copyright license in the code is not the really the most appropriate way.
If one wants to say "fuck copyright", putting a copyright license in the code is not the really the most appropriate way.