Re:A Shuffle of Aluminum, but to Banks, Pure Gold
by temphn on Saturday July 20, 2013 @09:02PM
(#6077313)
You're so hostile that you kick the ball into your own net. My question was whether LME was free to "change" the rule by abolishing it, or whether this was related to an underlying CFTC compliance issue. Because trying to increase the stringency of the rule did nothing:
This does not argue in favor of your tacit position that we just need more rules, or more men with guns to enforce them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.