Basically, promises are made that have no bearing on reality and the now has to suffer for it. I wish they'd give them the opportunity for a 401k. At least then they'd have an option of seeing something after 40 years of dedicated public service.
Also, the workers didn't promise themselves anything. They made a deal with their employers. The employers didn't have to agree to anything. They did, and those deals should be honored.
The employees getting the pensions are not the same ones doing the negotiating. By your theory, government employees would always get what they wanted and therefore never strike, but that's demonstrably not the ase.
It's funny, when a bank NINJA-loans a half-million dollars for a 1000ft^2 bungalow, it's always the-purchaser-took-advantage-of-the-bank, and never, the-bank-should-have-known-better-and-deserves-to-go-broke.
Any one know what kinds of perks Michigan as for state munis? In colorado you get a tax break on them.
Banks deserve to be exposed to the risk they assume in general, but this issue has problems in addition to the problem of banks being sheltered from risk.
Pensioners will be last in line as usual, I assume.
>If they force the bond holders to eat it all then the market for municipal bonds will be hurt badly.
Good.
> The irresponsible largess in the current government pension system needs to come to an end.
1. It's always the working stiffs who have to sacrifice, isn't it?
2. It has come to an end.