Re:Elon Musk to publish hyperloop design by August
by mjs on Monday July 15, 2013 @10:47AM
(#6045860)
Why announce the publication date in advance? It's not like he needs to disrupt anyone else's futuristic transport plan announcement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Elon Musk to publish hyperloop design by August
by swamp40 on Monday July 15, 2013 @10:56AM
(#6045931)
Probably some combination of:
a) He's getting asked a lot.
b) By publicly announcing a deadline, everyone involved (including him) will be racing to hit that deadline or lose face.
c) He's telling the world "I say what I do and I do what I say".
Re:Elon Musk to publish hyperloop design by August
by JunkDNA on Monday July 15, 2013 @11:23AM
(#6046133)
There was that recent PR article that made the rounds here last week from some company allegedly developing an evacuated tube based system that was written in a way to imply they were working on Musk's idea. I would not at all be surprised if he's a little miffed about that and has decided to just get everything out there.
Given that they may not actually be working on what he specifically has in mind, there is a risk that his idea gets a bad connotation if someone implements something similar (but not identical) and does it poorly. There is a whole political dimension to this in terms of getting zoning, approvals, etc... and the last thing he needs is for it to be stillborn because a bunch of politicians hear it "was tried and failed".
Re:Elon Musk to publish hyperloop design by August
by hankcharles on Monday July 15, 2013 @12:09PM
(#6046435)
is this the company you are referring to?
http://www.et3.com/
Re:Elon Musk to publish hyperloop design by August
by proksoup on Monday July 15, 2013 @01:28PM
(#6047069)
Well those guys are pretty transparent eh, a google checkout for their license http://et3.net/book/et3-license
I get physically ill trying to empathize with intellectual property sycophants.
Re:Elon Musk to publish hyperloop design by August
by JunkDNA on Monday July 15, 2013 @02:29PM
(#6047573)
Yes, here's the relevant discussion from HN: