Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates?
by count on Thursday July 11, 2013 @11:41PM
(#6030783)
A compromised CA in a client cert PKI world, like the DOD one I was talking about, is effectively an end-game scenario. Every machine in the org. would have to be updated (root CA's don't have CRLs, afaik).
The big risk isn't a mitm attack - that's a risk with traditional server-side certs. The big risk is that all of a sudden there are unlimited legitimate users with no control over identities anymore. It's like getting write access to /etc/passwd.
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates?
by dredmorbius on Friday July 12, 2013 @02:10AM
(#6031196)
Doesn't that depend on how you authorize the client certs themselves?
It's one thing to _issue_ a cert. It's another to _approve_ that issued cert.
If you're blindly accepting certs, you've got other issues.
Signed / validated keys (used for major sites in some browsers) also help this somewhat.
Not that SSL/TLS isn't a huge mess.