News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tools For Treason by rohamg on Sunday July 07, 2013 @04:56PM (#6003442)
no. the correct phrasing for the current of thought you reference would be "we refuse to submit to undemocratic/unconstitutional restrictions on the democratic process and will attempt to overturn the administrative consensus through technology". The majority of the time this comes through democratizing access to information, thus raising awareness and allowing the democratic process to work as designed.
Re:Tools For Treason by rayiner on Sunday July 07, 2013 @05:23PM (#6003554)
You can't claim to be fighting for the democratic process when public opinion is not on your side.
Re:Tools For Treason by tptacek on Sunday July 07, 2013 @11:41PM (#6005050)
Sure you can. Our democratic process involves people choosing a credible representative, who then hires a staff and meets with other representatives in order to make decisions. An activist working within the system can, as I feel like you've pointed out before, ignore public opinion and lobby representatives directly; "lobby" is a curse word around here, but obviously it's not always a bad thing.
Re:Tools For Treason by rohamg on Sunday July 07, 2013 @10:19PM (#6004741)
this is a silly comment. democratic process != majority rule. My point was precisely that by democratizing access to information, technology helps the public form an informed opinion.