News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by programminggeek on Friday July 05, 2013 @02:29PM (#5996110)
You aren't helping them unless you actually plan on clicking on the ads. Seriously, if you want to help out sites you like, pay them money.
Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by noneTheHacker on Friday July 05, 2013 @03:06PM (#5996269)
That's not always true. Some ad models just care that a user may have seen an ad. A lot of sites you can't just "pay them money."
Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by asperous on Friday July 05, 2013 @02:43PM (#5996172)
Some ad companies pay per view
Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by s3r3nity on Friday July 05, 2013 @02:49PM (#5996198)
Yeah but CPM (cost per impression metric) is not a scalable business model alone -- CPC (cost per click) or CPA (cost per acquisition) metrics have arisen because sites will spam impressions to people in Malaysia who will never buy anything...cheap impressions don't power a site for very long unfortunately.
Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by ceejayoz on Friday July 05, 2013 @04:22PM (#5996601)
Many sites in the news media are still primarily on impression-based ad revenue. Often, a print advertising purchase comes with a certain number of impressions on the website.
Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by fpgeek on Friday July 05, 2013 @11:38PM (#5997850)
Where did mst say that they didn't plan on clicking on any ads?

I'd imagine that most of the time people would only consider clicking on ads they found "not annoying" in the first place.

Re:Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted by ceejayoz on Friday July 05, 2013 @03:12PM (#5996298)
Impression-based costing isn't unheard-of, even today.