News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by beachstartup on Sunday June 30, 2013 @04:47PM (#5967124)
worst analogy ever, especially for a post that so thinly veils your misguided feelings of superiority.

ferraris were meant to be tweaked, what do you think the entire field of motorsport exists for? from F1 all the way down to the local DE event at the local track, cars are tweaked endlessly, with passion. you won't find any shortage of tweaked exotics at your local autocross, either. if nobody "twaeked" cars, you wouldn't have ANY of the improvements in performance, safety, and comfort you find in your modern automobile.

and furthermore, a HUGE aftermarket exists for ferraris (and other cars, expensive or not) for the sole purpose of tweaking them and making them go faster, safer

there is no philosophical difference between the manufacturer "tweaking" cars, a privateer racing team putting together a specialized hill climber, or an enthusiast "tweaking" his own car in a garage while drinking six packs. none whatsoever. it's people, working on cars. period.

it's incredible there are people on HN like you. i'm a little shocked to be honest.

Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by Dove on Sunday June 30, 2013 @05:14PM (#5967246)
it's incredible there are people on HN like you. i'm a little shocked to be honest.

Yes, I was also sure this site was populated exclusively with ferrari-tweaking experts. I'm a little shocked, too, but there it is. ;)

Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by beachstartup on Sunday June 30, 2013 @07:06PM (#5967663)
oh, yeah i guess i didn't include the porsche people like DHH and his le mans prototypes.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by JacksonGariety on Sunday June 30, 2013 @06:53PM (#5967606)
That was a fantastic response.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by indlebe on Sunday June 30, 2013 @04:59PM (#5967169)
I agree with you aside from your last comment. That wasn't needed. It's great that we have diversity of opinions on here.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by mistercow on Sunday June 30, 2013 @05:19PM (#5967260)
>It's great that we have diversity of opinions on here.

I agree that the last comment was overly snooty (I think it was in response to the implied snootiness of the original comment, but snootiness does not justify more snootiness).

That said, I think there's a bit of an indirection of the point when you go to celebrating "diversity of opinions". Yes, diversity of opinions is good, but there is a difference between "diversity" and "the space of all possibilities". Some opinions are just dumb, and having them doesn't improve the community.

More importantly, it is not merely the opinion that is being rejected - it is the attitude accompanying the opinion. If the original comment had been something along the lines of "I'm wary of trying psychoactive drugs because it seems like the brain is a very sensitive organ, and messing with its state could have subtle unintended consequences", then it would be expressing a very similar opinion, but the attitude would be completely different.

By the same token, if the original comment had said "You're wasting your life if you don't use psychoactives to broaden your horizons", then that would be a polar opposite opinion, expressed with a similarly unacceptable attitude.

I'm happy to see either of those opinions expressed on HN. But I'd happily do without either attitude.

Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by dominotw on Sunday June 30, 2013 @04:52PM (#5967145)
Ouch. That was unnecessarly rude. Not a good analogy I agree.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by cristianpascu on Sunday June 30, 2013 @04:56PM (#5967161)
Do we have like sectarian wars on HN now? Who's worthy of being on HN and who's not?
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by icebraining on Sunday June 30, 2013 @06:06PM (#5967438)
Haven't we always? When one gets a lot of downvotes, the software often responds with an (hell)ban. How is that not the community deciding that some people are not worthy of being on HN?
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by makeset on Sunday June 30, 2013 @05:36PM (#5967330)
You don't have much of a sense of humor, do you.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by vehementi on Sunday June 30, 2013 @05:51PM (#5967383)
If nobody gets your joke, the failure in communication was yours - and probably your own sense of humour.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by xxchan on Sunday June 30, 2013 @06:30PM (#5967516)
Irregardless of that, the reply to OP's comment is representative of the attitudes that are common of HN. Sometimes I feel people just disagree and take apart anything for no other reason than longing for plain acknowledgement.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by beachstartup on Sunday June 30, 2013 @08:18PM (#5967927)
irregardless is not a word
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by phaemon on Monday July 01, 2013 @07:55AM (#5969992)
I think it is: I just saw two people use it and they both knew what it meant. ;)
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by baby on Sunday June 30, 2013 @07:22PM (#5967736)
Are you sure he's not making a joke as well?