News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A Hacker's Replacement for Gmail. Parent comment

Re:A Hacker's Replacement for Gmail by joe_bleau on Sunday June 30, 2013 @02:05AM (#5964851)
It could be an artifact of my postfix configuration. Looking over a few logfiles, here are the ciphers I've seen recently (all servers, not just gmail):

ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) AES128-SHA (128/128 bits) AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits) RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Hacker's Replacement for Gmail by bigiain on Sunday June 30, 2013 @02:29AM (#5964898)
Curiously, I'm seeing a bunch of TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256 between one of my machines and google...

I wonder why/when the connections end up RC4-SHA instead?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Hacker's Replacement for Gmail by viveksec on Sunday June 30, 2013 @02:37AM (#5964919)
Google serves up static content uses DHE. We've noticed only Google sites using DSA certs with ECDHE. A report on what we found http://trisul.org/blog/dsa-xdrill/post.html
[ Parent | on HN ]