News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Making the web fun again by alan_cx on Friday June 28, 2013 @11:25AM (#5958475)
Im 41, I might have been mucking around with the internet before you, and while a hell of a lot is fantastic about the internet now, yeah, Im kinda lost and homeless too. Know what you mean.

Not to say the internet , or web is or has gone wrong, just kinda forgotten something very important, very vital.

What Neocities is doing is good, and I hope it works, but I'm not sure how this addresses that our, er, alienation (not sure if that is the right word) though. I read that they want to, and that is good, but I don't see anything they offer that really does that.

What if we had some sort of SubWeb (have I just invented that word? I really like the sound of it!!!) which you have to use the command line to access? :)

Re:Making the web fun again by digitalsushi on Friday June 28, 2013 @11:34AM (#5958528)
I wanted to reply to you because you struck a chord with me - yes, emphatically I must agree that command line interfaces have forever been a sieve that collects a certain mentality. I don't want to label this subset of people because I will not do it correctly, but I believe it is assured that a predilection for CLI invokes precisely some sort of human artifact that is aligned with being a geek.
Re:Making the web fun again by alan_cx on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:03PM (#5958682)
Yup, I agree. Same sort of thing where people put down the use of things like Dreamweaver, claiming note pad is better. Same mentality, I think. And even though I would argue logically for Dreamweaver, I would still sort of feel the notepad advocates had a point. Yeah, typing feels more "real", even more exciting.

I then think is it a generational thing? But only yesterday was I sat there on that genetic car racing site watching live as people tried to hack the chat box. Command line again. I assume these were kids. Yet there they were in 2013 excitedly hacking away using the keyboard.

To tangent even more.... That was great to watch. Kids (I assume) excitedly trying to hack the chat box, by typing stuff, while the admins updated and updated them away. A wonderful race and frankly a joy to watch. YES hacking and defacing is bad, it even pissed me off to start with, but then I realised that there was something so energetic, or alive, about it. It was like sort of watching life or something. It reminded me of one of those movies where we see the "geek hero" furiously typing away at a terminal trying to stop a nuke launch or some such. Dunno how to describe it really. Anyway, the admins won easily and quickly, and that's as it should be.

Edit: All that waffle and I forgot the point...

Basically, those kids reminded me of back in the day. I guess the spirit me and the OP were talking about. So, IMHO, it is still alive. Heh, unless such kids end up in US jails....

Re:Making the web fun again by creamyhorror on Friday June 28, 2013 @01:10PM (#5959084)
This is why I loved (the idea of) MUDs/MOOs so much in the mid/late '90s. They were mysterious worlds to explore, and it was exciting to know that the admins ("wizards") were adding more areas purely through the magic of their keyboards. People would do crazy things sometimes to try to mess around with the world or other players. As a newish player, you didn't know what you might encounter.

I still see a bit of that in the pirate Minecraft servers that my little brother sometimes plays on. Micro-communities with their own rules, custom mods and settings, and kids horsing around and building their own flights of fancy. That's the kind of organic exploration and worldbuilding I'd really like to be involved in eventually.

I think I'd like to build a connectable MOO-like world in which people could set up their own areas/rooms and connect them to a limited number of neighbors. Give them item creation and scripting capabilities as well. Simple, hackable, and almost completely user-created. Woops, that'd just be text-based Second Life. Maybe with some unusual features like a resource/power grid that varies according to the average amount of players in each room (to incentivize building interesting, entertaining scenes and scenarios). Or maybe the initial set of rooms could be all these NeoCities pages converted to ASCII graphics and randomly connected. Who knows.

Let me know if anyone's building a fun interconnected playground along these lines and is looking for contributions. I'm probably not good or energetic enough to do it alone.

Re:Making the web fun again by barbs on Friday June 28, 2013 @09:26PM (#5961199)
> I think I'd like to build a connectable MOO-like world in which people could set up their own areas/rooms and connect them to a limited number of neighbors. Give them item creation and scripting capabilities as well. Simple, hackable, and almost completely user-created. Woops, that'd just be text-based Second Life.

This sounds a lot like LambdaMoo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LambdaMOO).

An interesting write-up of one's experience in the game: http://www.juliandibbell.com/texts/mytinylife.html.

Re:Making the web fun again by creamyhorror on Saturday June 29, 2013 @01:38AM (#5961581)
I actually read and enjoyed a book in '97 that introduced MUDs, including LambdaMOO, so having you bring LambdaMOO up is no surprise. I read bits of that book you linked, and these parts near the end resonate:

---------------

..."It's not your fault," he said. "But after you came looking for pelts, and traded trinkets with us, the covered wagons of conventional reality followed along the trails we'd blazed. The trails were cut by animals, the animals have been driven out by suburban sprawl. . . . How could it be otherwise?"

Not surprisingly perhaps, Horton's fellow anarch and rabble-rouser Finn is also unimpressed with Lambda's current state of affairs, though his complaints, typically, are a little more down-to-earth. "There's nothing you can sink your teeth into these days," he says, pointing to a general absence of the sort of MOO-engulfing controversies he once thrived on. "Politics I guess is dead. People have settled into the arbitration disputes; they get a kick out of that for a while, but they're mostly frivolous disputes and people just wanting to get attention." Real life, meanwhile, has taken on more interest for Finn. He finally moved out of his parents' basement a couple years ago, setting out for Rochester, New York, to found an Internet software business with some other MUDders he knew, and once he got there, he also ended up in a serious RL relationship with a woman he had previously known only as Aurea on LambdaMOO. Two years down the road, both ventures appear to be going swimmingly. His company isn't the next Netscape or anything, but it's landed some respectable gigs, including a contract to run the official _Sally Jessy Raphael_ chat room; Finn and Aurea remain happily involved. His days as an online Casanova and all-around firebrand are pretty well over, but if he misses them much he doesn't show it. He still MOOs daily, but he mostly just sits idling in Lambda House's smoking room while he goes about his business at work. "I've still got friends on Lambda, and it's still fun," he says. "But it's not as much of a stage where you can play out your political ambitions and real arguments. It's no longer really a metaphor for real life. It's just not as passionate, I suppose."

...

He'd left his lousy secretarial job as well, his RL in general was gradually getting happier, and the happier it got the less he felt like spending time in virtual reality. "In retrospect," he says, "it's evident to me just how much the misery of my real life (and not my intellectual curiosity, or my gender-role issues, or whatever) was the thing that made VR seem so dazzling back inna the day.

"Then there was also the fact that VR had started to seem tacky," he adds. "By '96 it seemed like every yutz in the world was on the Internet, 'living the fantasy.' Whatever elitist pioneer spirit had seemed to me to permeate Lambda back in '91 or '92 was completely gone. I missed that, and Interzone was marginal compensation at best."

And so he just stopped going, basically. He let his spares die out, reaped one by one as he let them lie, and he now logs on to Lambda once a month, at most, to check his MOO-mail. It's enough for him. "I'm teaching prep-school English and living in Austin with a woman I really like," he tells me. "My life is pretty simple now. I feel like I've grown up a lot."

...

Weary though she may be, however, she doesn't regret her involvement in the political debates that ultimately exhausted her. "I'm way beyond sick of theorizing about cyberspace," she says, "and have become completely anti-utopian about VR, but all in all the experience has been good for me. It's made me a much better writer . . . encouraged me to go out and get myself published. It's also given me a social presence IRL in a way I never used to think I had. After all the practice I got taking stands, making points, influencing audiences who were sometimes incredibly hostile, grad student seminars, for instance, came to seem comparatively amazingly easy places to formulate and express arguments."

-------------

Here we see the end of involvement (or infatuation) with a virtual world playing out: with finding real life more interesting and enriching. Maybe that's the lesson of virtual worlds - whether MUDs or EVE Online - you eventually tire of them and leave, but they change you and set you on new paths (to another career, or a business).

I guess I need to take the nostalgia goggles off and realize things won't be the same the second time round.

Re:Making the web fun again by rabbitonrails on Friday June 28, 2013 @10:10PM (#5961273)
Re:Making the web fun again by ahsteele on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:06PM (#5958701)
A colleague of mine and I are given a presentation at the end of the summer entitled "Mousehate: Increasing accessibility of Web Applications one QWERTY at a time." The focus will be on keyboard enabling web apps both with keyboard and CLI like commands.
Re:Making the web fun again by crucialfelix on Sunday June 30, 2013 @06:34AM (#5965325)
Re:Making the web fun again by unlucky on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:18PM (#5958784)
I can't agree enough. I can remember being mystified when I first saw a CLI "expert". It was like he attached a Game Genie to my computer.
Re:Making the web fun again by zem on Sunday June 30, 2013 @01:17AM (#5964770)
http://theody.net/elements.html is a beautiful essay on the topic: "in a world increasingly dominated by image culture (TV, movies, .jpg files), UNIX remains rooted in the culture of the word."
Re:Making the web fun again by comefrom30 on Friday June 28, 2013 @11:41AM (#5958557)
> What if we had some sort of SubWeb (have I just invented that word? I really like the sound of it!!!) which you have to use the command line to access? :)

Eventually there will be someone posting on HN about how they built a GUI to make to the SubWeb accessible for everyone. :)

What are you envisioning for the SubWeb? A geek-only web? Just curious.

Re:Making the web fun again by alan_cx on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:16PM (#5958770)
No idea, it just came to me as I was typing.

But I suppose something like sort of modernising the old method of firing up a terminal and issuing manual GET commands. So, have something called a command line browser, and sites that only work with it. Not to keep any one out, just simply to do it another way. No practice purpose really, just fun for old guys!!! Very silly and point less, of course!!

Re:Making the web fun again by spydum on Friday June 28, 2013 @11:11PM (#5961389)
Sounds like you ought to try surfing the web using netcat. It isn't so bad, except for typing out all these damn cookies.
Re:Making the web fun again by dugmartin on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:05PM (#5958699)
I'm 41 too. If you want a feel of the old days of command line access you can always browse gopher via a proxy (now that most browsers have dropped gopher protocol support):

http://gopherproxy.meulie.net/gopher.floodgap.com/

Re:Making the web fun again by jimbosis on Friday June 28, 2013 @01:34PM (#5959232)
If you want to set up a 'gopher hole,' an SDF shell account (free and/or $1 donation to 'validate') includes 50 MB of space for a gopher page. It also has the 'bboard' community bulletin board, which I believe has code heritage going back to the dial-up BBS days. http://sdf.org/

Floodgap, which you link to via the meulie proxy, also offers a gopher proxy. http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/ (that's the intro page, with links into the gopherspace).

The original UMN 'gopher' client (and gopherd server) are available under the GPL now. http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/gw?gopher://gopher.quux.or...

The client at least is available Debian and Ubuntu. Regarding the client, it's amazing how productive one can be without one's fingers ever leaving the arrow keys. The gopher killed the mouse! There are also other servers available such as bucktooth (perl) and pygopherd. Port 70, baby!

Re:Making the web fun again by alan_cx on Friday June 28, 2013 @01:02PM (#5959046)
Yeah, having read the replied and ideas, Gopher is sort of what I was thinking. Its coming back to me now...

Im going to do some revision reading.

Re:Making the web fun again by ewood on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:15PM (#5958760)
It is a great idea that just needs the right medium. BBSs were a great medium because it took effort to find a board, connect and learn the etiquette. The early web was a great medium because it was a whole new environment to learn and explore. Wide-area adhoc wifi networks were a great medium because they had the real hacker appeal of having to find an unwanted microwave antenna to turn to a new use and search out like-minded individuals to connect to.

If you could find a medium that has the same sort of DIY/frontiersman feeling people will flock to it. Having a new world to explore and having constraints to overcome are the things that made the internet great.

Re:Making the web fun again by alan_cx on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:59PM (#5959026)
Oh hang on. Minecraft? Is that what we are talking about? Or perhaps are the kids using that like we sort of used the internet in the old days? Ish?
Re:Making the web fun again by ebiester on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:41PM (#5958905)
Re:Making the web fun again by tarr11 on Friday June 28, 2013 @11:51AM (#5958615)
I like the idea of a command line only web. Like Zork, but for the whole internet.
Re:Making the web fun again by krelian on Friday June 28, 2013 @02:24PM (#5959557)
I don't know if a command line interface is what we need. I just want more like sites like these (just a couple of examples of the top of my head but generally you just "know" these when you see them):

http://nuwen.net/

http://starling.rinet.ru/music/index.htm

http://bisqwit.iki.fi/

http://www.worldhistorymaps.info/maps.html

Re:Making the web fun again by UVB-76 on Saturday June 29, 2013 @05:42AM (#5961867)
> What if we had some sort of SubWeb (have I just invented that word? I really like the sound of it!!!) which you have to use the command line to access? :)

There are still a load of great communities below the 'surface' of the web.

Private torrent trackers are a good example. The good ones are invite-only, limit the number of members, or at the very least require a degree of technical knowledge to gain access.

Access is treated as a privilege, and members act accordingly.

Re:Making the web fun again by Gormo on Sunday June 30, 2013 @01:02AM (#5964753)
There are quite a lot of old-school BBSes configured for telnet access.[1] There's even a telnet/SSH client called SyncTerm [2] that emulates old terminal modes with authentic fonts.

There's also a site called Telehack that's an attempt to simulate what the internet would have been like for the typical user about 25 years ago - pre-web.[3]

There's a lot of stuff like this out there that satisfies itches for nostalgia, creativity, and an open frontier all at once.

[1] http://www.telnetbbsguide.com/

[2] http://syncterm.bbsdev.net/

[3] http://www.telehack.com/ (or, for a more authentic experience, telnet in with SyncTerm)

Re:Making the web fun again by rch on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:45PM (#5958927)
Agreed. Why isn't there a dot txt tld?
Re:Making the web fun again by rocky1138 on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:51PM (#5958971)
Take a look at http://sdf.org.
Re:Making the web fun again by mosburger on Friday June 28, 2013 @06:52PM (#5960724)
I've been dwelling on the idea of how cool it'd be to resurrect gopher as sort of an "underground web" for a few years now. Might be perfect for your "SubWeb" ^_^
Re:Making the web fun again by sergeykish on Friday June 28, 2013 @05:59PM (#5960551)
Just make a page with pure content - no layout, no styles. It looks good in text browser or piped through htmlfmt yet unreadable for most users.
Re:Making the web fun again by leephillips on Friday June 28, 2013 @07:55PM (#5960957)
Why would this be unreadable for anyone?
Re:Making the web fun again by sergeykish on Friday June 28, 2013 @09:03PM (#5961136)
Too many shiny things around.

We live in the world where newness is absolute truth criteria. Those who don't want to know history filter content by freshness. Now, there are so many of them that applications have to constantly redesigns themself. Changing back and forth, catching trends.

I know cause I've also believed in novelty, all old looking content was in my blind spot. Things changed once started to read academic papers. It appeared those who are confident don't use distraction to share thoughts.

Re:Making the web fun again by leephillips on Saturday June 29, 2013 @09:50AM (#5962374)
Now I see what you mean: unreadable because of psychology, not technology. I think I'm the opposite, maybe because I've been reading academic papers for so long: the websites with no or very little styling catch my eye, and part of my brain suspects that the content might be interesting. If it's too shiny, it's in my blind spot.
Re:Making the web fun again by CanSpice on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:05PM (#5958696)
By "SubWeb" do you mean "gopher"?
Re:Making the web fun again by alan_cx on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:18PM (#5958776)
I don't know, I just made it up. So, maybe.
Re:Making the web fun again by dangoor on Friday June 28, 2013 @03:52PM (#5960015)
You could probably fire up a Gopher server :)