News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We were wrong by Metrop0218 on Friday June 21, 2013 @12:14PM (#5918840)
EDIT: Apparently the OP was being sarcastic, and I failed to read deep enough into the ASCII characters. But if he hadn't been sarcastic, I would've still said what I said below.

What the hell? I had to read this over 6 times to make sure I was understanding it correctly.

"Women are sensitive, fragile, inferior creatures who require constant, vigilant protection from honorable men."

That right there ladies and gentlemen, is the thinking that permeates and sustains misogyny throughout our world.

I understand that the original poster had good intentions, but the way is high and his eyes are definitely upon the ground.

Women are not sensitive, fragil, or inferior. Please avoid false blanket statements like this.

Re:We were wrong by rlt on Friday June 21, 2013 @12:21PM (#5918932)
Hint: sarcasm
Re:We were wrong by Metrop0218 on Friday June 21, 2013 @12:25PM (#5918982)
Ah, pretty poorly worded sarcasm there.
Re:We were wrong by rlt on Friday June 21, 2013 @12:50PM (#5919222)
Subtle sarcasm is the best sarcasm, IMHO.
Re:We were wrong by vacri on Friday June 21, 2013 @10:29PM (#5922312)
Not in text. There are too few cues available to avoid Poe's law.
Re:We were wrong by jff on Friday June 21, 2013 @12:21PM (#5918934)
It's sarcasm, dumbass.
Re:We were wrong by Metrop0218 on Friday June 21, 2013 @12:25PM (#5918977)
It's pretty poorly done sarcasm, as many others didn't believe it either, asshole.
Re:We were wrong by Dylan16807 on Friday June 21, 2013 @02:06PM (#5919863)
Sarcasm means you're not supposed to believe it. You were right the first five times you read it; you should have stopped there. I don't see any way in which this sarcasm was done poorly.