News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I retracted my Nature paper: correcting the scientifi... by driverdan on Wednesday June 19, 2013 @06:54PM (#5908982)
> it showed that expression of CD95L on Sertoli cells in allogeneic mismatched testes tissue transplanted under the kidney capsule was able to induce apoptosis of invading cytotoxic T cells

I imagine the way reading this made me feel is similar to how an average person feels reading about complex computer science issues.

Re:Why I retracted my Nature paper: correcting the scientifi... by refurb on Wednesday June 19, 2013 @09:42PM (#5909668)
Basically it's just saying that if you take a particular genetic sequence and introduce it into foreign cells, you can put them into a body where you'd expect an immune response (t cells), but in fact you actually see those cells die instead (apoptosis).

It's too bad it didn't turn out to be true as it would have been an incredible advancement in transplantation.

Re:Why I retracted my Nature paper: correcting the scientifi... by pjscott on Wednesday June 19, 2013 @08:39PM (#5909462)
Yes, exactly. It's a pretty straightforward statement -- if you know what the words mean, and why it's significant. If you don't have that background knowledge, it's completely opaque.