News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Senate Staffers Told To Pretend Top Secret Docs Are Not W... by jessriedel on Saturday June 15, 2013 @10:36AM (#5885111)
This is a well-known and important aspect of keeping data classified. Just because classified information is leaked does not mean that people with clearance can treat it as unclassified. There is lots of bogus "classified" information out there, and an excellent way to limit the harm of leaked truly classified info (which is unavoidable) is to make it indistinguishable from bogus info. And the way to do this is to not confirm or deny that it is legitimate.

Yes, this means people with clearance will sometimes have to sound silly when it becomes overwhelmingly clear that the info is legitimate. But the alternative is for individuals with clearance to effectively declassify information unilaterally, which would be disastrous. Instead, information is only declassified by folks at the top.

This is just the basic idea I gathered from working near labs doing classified research. Some of the explanations for seemingly bizarre behavior concerning classified information gets even deeper into the "because he'll think that she'll think that he'll think...." rabbit hole. Someone who actually has clearance can probably speak on this much more usefully than I can.

Re:Senate Staffers Told To Pretend Top Secret Docs Are Not W... by Retric on Saturday June 15, 2013 @11:36AM (#5885259)
I would just like to add that treating a lot of things a classified information is useful as someone seeing top secret stamped on a report has no idea if it's worth blowing cover or even just opening to read.
Re:Senate Staffers Told To Pretend Top Secret Docs Are Not W... by LanceH on Saturday June 15, 2013 @02:41PM (#5885898)
Basically you don't reference "leaked" material at all. That would be confirming its accuracy and lending provenance. The last thing you want to do is verify it.

Other things you don't want to do is acknowledge that you are also privy to such information. These things are actually tied together bit by bit. While it might be assumed that a senator on the armed forces committee has access, it could be unknown which of his aides does his classified work.

Some of this is the origin of the "can neither confirm nor deny" phrase. While it may be obvious to everyone that the CIA won't tell you who the spies are, they also won't tell you who isn't a spy, even when it is completely obvious.

Some of the classified stuff may be at the very edge of marginal speculation, but it adds up, like a logic puzzle or a giant game of Clue.

Re:Senate Staffers Told To Pretend Top Secret Docs Are Not W... by Dylan16807 on Saturday June 15, 2013 @08:10PM (#5886740)
I don't follow the logic. Why can't you discuss the documents on the internet as 'alleged classified information'? That reveals absolutely nothing about what you are actually privy to. Not being able to talk about it at all is ridiculous.
Re:Senate Staffers Told To Pretend Top Secret Docs Are Not W... by sfall on Saturday June 15, 2013 @11:23AM (#5885224)
I agree, but it doesn't make it the whole thing look any better.