Re:Silicon Valley builds spy tools, is horrified when they’r...
by meepmorp on Friday June 14, 2013 @08:15PM
(#5883286)
Your good and evil are not necessarily (almost certainly) not mine.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley builds spy tools, is horrified when they’r...
by tlrobinson on Friday June 14, 2013 @08:18PM
(#5883298)
Sure, but you could come up with a license that's more specific, like "The Software shall not by used by any government agency or contractors for surveillance purposes" or whatever the equivalent legal speak is.
Re:Silicon Valley builds spy tools, is horrified when they’r...
by meepmorp on Friday June 14, 2013 @08:33PM
(#5883330)
So, I can't use this computer vision library as part of my government program to prevent Rhino poaching in Africa?
Re:Silicon Valley builds spy tools, is horrified when they’r...
by itsybitsycoder on Friday June 14, 2013 @10:11PM
(#5883612)
You could if you asked the author and they agreed to give you a different license.
Re:Silicon Valley builds spy tools, is horrified when they’r...
by mpyne on Friday June 14, 2013 @11:17PM
(#5883791)
It's hardly free/open source software if you need to get a license from the author for each specific usage. Even MS treats their customers better than that.
Re:Silicon Valley builds spy tools, is horrified when they’r...
by itsybitsycoder on Saturday June 15, 2013 @02:26PM
(#5885853)
You don't need a license for each specific usage. Most software doesn't involve surveillance, and most government surveillance software would probably not be an "exception" in the author's eyes. Rhino surveillance is an obscure edge case.