News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court: Natural Isolated DNA Not Patentable, Synth... by clarkm on Thursday June 13, 2013 @03:02PM (#5875925)
Ok, what's your point?

I don't think "well-actually" comments are bad. Wikipedia says to avoid weasel words and "expressions that lack precision" [1], and I think well-actually statements often help clear up such ambiguity.

If someone follows up their "well, actually..." with a legitimate correction of the facts, then I don't see a problem with it.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words

Re:Supreme Court: Natural Isolated DNA Not Patentable, Synth... by niels_olson on Thursday June 13, 2013 @03:19PM (#5876006)
I think that in verbal parley well-actually comments are a lesser degree of the same offense as shooting down someone else's idea in a brainstorming session. Not only does it tend to silence the first speaker by shaming, it tends to derail the larger conversation. In this written context, it's less of an issue, though nested comments do create a similar potential context.

Granted, sometimes you gotta break some eggs. But don't be surprised when the hen who laid that egg isn't to be happy about it.