Re:Fertile Ground
by idbentley on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @09:05PM
(#5865792)
This is ridiculous. One uninnovative developer getting excited about fewer choices and lower quality in iOS application.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fertile Ground
by ghshephard on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @10:03PM
(#5866024)
Uninnovative?
Tumblr, Instapaper, "The Magazine.", atp.fm?
Just saying.
Re:Fertile Ground
by pazimzadeh on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @09:09PM
(#5865806)
You're ridiculous, and I predict that Marco will be laughing his way to the bank. Let's revisit this in say December or Spring of next year, shall we?
> getting excited about fewer choices and lower quality
> laughing his way to the bank
Error: type mismatch identified.
Re:Fertile Ground
by pazimzadeh on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @09:26PM
(#5865869)
What users need is not more choice; as Marco said, the App Store is crowded. What users need is higher quality apps, which iOS 7 will purportedly enable. Therefore, developers who take advantage of this opportunity will make more money than those who don't.
I am using the beta on my primary phone, and I am starting to see what Marco is talking about.
Re:Fertile Ground
by sillysaurus on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @10:27PM
(#5866119)
There's a fallacy in your reasoning: that quality wins.
This isn't always true. Word of mouth is a much more powerful force than raw quality. Look at eBay, for example.
Most apps luckily don't have many network effects. But I won't be switching PDF readers just because the new one looks more like iOS 7.
Re:Fertile Ground
by pazimzadeh on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @10:53PM
(#5866237)
I agree with you, although I think that Apple is betting that "looks more like iOS 7" is more like "works better thanks to features only available in iOS 7".
See this tweet by @flyosity:
"Damn, the UIKit animation/dynamics effects in iOS 7 are some seriously futuristic stuff. Can't wait to see what people do with it."