News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual Studio 2013 by gokhan on Monday June 03, 2013 @04:21PM (#5815684)
Try R# with VS.
Re:Visual Studio 2013 by pointyhats on Monday June 03, 2013 @04:40PM (#5815844)
Try R# with VS in a solution with 54 projects and ~ 1.5MLOC...

It stinks!

Re:Visual Studio 2013 by trust-me on Monday June 03, 2013 @07:16PM (#5816728)
Are you serious? That's a medium size project, just get a fast machine (e.g. i7 4770) and you'll be perfectly fine.
Re:Visual Studio 2013 by pointyhats on Tuesday June 04, 2013 @01:20AM (#5817864)
I've got an 8 core 3.0 Xeon with 32Gb RAM and Samsung 840. It's still slow.

It's more latency than long waits but it's enough to stop me using it.

Re:Visual Studio 2013 by trust-me on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @03:39PM (#5828069)
8 core Xeon would be good at video rendering, but as of now for VS and R# you need single threaded performance, where a 3.9GHz Haswell shines.
Re:Visual Studio 2013 by wluu on Monday June 03, 2013 @06:46PM (#5816585)
Well, I don't know how many LOC I have, but I'm sure close to or more than that.

But we've got 62 projects. I've turned off a few things like code analysis in R# and it runs fairly well.

Re:Visual Studio 2013 by manojlds on Tuesday June 04, 2013 @12:02AM (#5817641)
But the point is, we have to buy the costly VS AND pay a third party to get the real goodness of an IDE.