Re:Monsanto gives up fight for genetically modified plants i...
by glhaynes on Friday May 31, 2013 @03:41PM
(#5800898)
The whole thing is complicated (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farmers_suicides_in_India) and the Daily Mail has a history of being an awful source.
Re:Monsanto gives up fight for genetically modified plants i...
by smsm42 on Friday May 31, 2013 @04:37PM
(#5801236)
I agree, it is complicated. That's why it is shameful for Daily Mail to take a complicated story and rewrite it as a single-cause case against GM.
Re:Monsanto gives up fight for genetically modified plants i...
by genwin on Friday May 31, 2013 @04:46PM
(#5801280)
The story confirms that the seeds must be purchased anew with each season.
Re:Monsanto gives up fight for genetically modified plants i...
by nitrogen on Friday May 31, 2013 @07:09PM
(#5801793)
I seem to recall seeing claims that GM cotton was more susceptible to certain pests, especially if you didn't spray it with the pesticide produced by the manufacturer of the seeds.
Re:Monsanto gives up fight for genetically modified plants i...
by genwin on Friday May 31, 2013 @04:42PM
(#5801254)
The way I read the article, it's mainly pricing of the GM product that led indirectly to their despair. They could've handled the crop failure with the cheaper non-GM seeds.
It's analogous to US students getting into a pickle by accepting large student loans and then finding no jobs in their field. But if they don't take the risk they may lose to those who took the risk. They'd almost all be better off if the student loans weren't available.
Of course, even GM crops can not protect from all causes of crop failure. But blaming them on every cause of failure is wrong.