Results of the Debian systemd survey

Re:Results of the Debian systemd survey by buster on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @09:45AM (#5779978)

No, not working for any of them. See my comment that it's still incorrect saying Lennart does all the work. You can easily check the git yourself, go ahead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Results of the Debian systemd survey by jeltz on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @10:22AM (#5780199)

Was there something wron with the methodology used in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01365.html which showed a 78% contribution from Pottering?

Personally I do not see anything wrong with that, but 78% is basically doing all the coding.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Results of the Debian systemd survey by buster on Wednesday May 29, 2013 @03:42AM (#5785144)

Well, i did the same and came to vastly different numbers. It's easy to do: Do a git checkout and run

git ls-files | grep -v udev | xargs -n1 -d'\n' -i git blame {} | perl -n -e '/\s\((.*?)\s[0-9]{4}/ && print "$1\n"' | sort -f | uniq -c -w3 | sort -n

Even taking out udev shows Kay Sievers contributing nearly as much as Lennart. It also shows many other people contributing. That there is a main developer that does a lot of work is not something negative about a project, isn't it?!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Results of the Debian systemd survey by nknighthb on Wednesday May 29, 2013 @05:07AM (#5785336)

> i did the same

No, you didn't. Your command line is not limited to source code, but includes, for starters, the massive hardware database checked in by Kay:

   66888 hwdb/20-pci-vendor-model.hwdb
   66185 hwdb/20-OUI.hwdb
   49014 hwdb/20-usb-vendor-model.hwdb
    6596 hwdb/20-acpi-vendor.hwdb

You performed a fundamentally different and flawed test.

> That there is a main developer that does a lot of work is not something negative about a project, isn't it?!

You were the one who complained about Canonical not "working together", not me. I'm just holding you to your own standard.

[ Parent | on HN ]