The description you gave above sounds like any working parent anywhere. If the answer is "No" to a startup, then it would have to be "No" to being a simple employee as well.
And maybe I did make the wrong choice when I compared him to myself, it's not about me - but the GP implied an argument about my lack of experience and hence reduced value of my statement. I should just stop arguing on the internet all together, really - it's a no-win situation.
It's a warm welcome amidst all the American 'work work work work work life balance' culture that's prevalent on HN (for understandable reasons, after all, most of HN is American).
There's no point in telling each other all the time how you can't do a startup (or good/interesting software work in general) unless you put in 70 hour weeks for two years straight, so I like reading the occasional counter argument, such as yours here.
"Even with the hectic work demands that I face on a daily basis, I’m still able to be very involved in the lives of my wife and two young daughters."
"Each week, my daughters and I have a “daddy-daughter” night where the three of us go to dinner." (whoah, a whole evening per week?)
"For me, this means setting aside time to relax with my family and give them my full, undivided attention."
"I’m online 24/7 and always checking email."
So I guess the answer to the headline is, if I'm to follow the article, either "no" or "for some definitions of 'daddy'"?