I took the $300K

Re:I took the $300K by jcampbell1 on Sunday May 26, 2013 @02:39PM (#5771990)

Microsoft's unwillingness to bump people to market is short sighted. I'd take the offer, then shift my hours to the bare minimum. I'd spend all the new free time learning or working on side projects. I damn sure wouldn't be all that committed to helping Microsoft beat google at search. This seems like the obvious thing to do, and not far from what the author did.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I took the $300K by SurfScore on Sunday May 26, 2013 @04:13PM (#5772272)

This is why big companies get slow and bloated. Behavior like this only happens when people are in it for the money and don't really care about what they're building.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I took the $300K by jcampbell1 on Sunday May 26, 2013 @10:35PM (#5773177)

From what I have read, Google doesn't operate this way. My understanding is they don't keep everyone from an acquisition. While this seems a bit rude fire someone or make talented engineers re-apply for their own job, it does mean the people they do keep become Google engineers rather than 2 year indentured servants who have no incentive to join the company culture.

All strategies are problematic.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I took the $300K by taude on Sunday May 26, 2013 @11:07PM (#5773250)

Back in the day (circa 1996 with my experience), MSFT made employees from acquisitions re-apply for their jobs and go through the full interview process.

[ Parent | on HN ]