Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by mike_esspe on Friday May 24, 2013 @04:23AM
(#5761766)
Probably there should be a resource tax, not profit tax?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by nknighthb on Friday May 24, 2013 @05:15AM
(#5761911)
How do you efficiently administer a road tax[1]? How do you measure a company's use of the military defense of a nation? The police protection that makes their locality safe for business in the first place? What about the nearby public park that attracts families who frequently go to a nearby ice cream shop? What about the fact that the local bar attracts people who get into fights on the sidewalk?
[1]Gas taxes are obviously not the answer.
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by lostlogin on Friday May 24, 2013 @04:50AM
(#5761850)
How would this work? 20% every time you buy or something? Or targeted on things that are scarce or a limited (eg higher tax on oil than lettuce)? It seems to me that targeted taxes end up encouraging elaborate workarounds - this is a problem.
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by noblethrasher on Friday May 24, 2013 @04:56AM
(#5761869)
Yes, and the utility companies are extremely efficient collectors of that kind of tax.