Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by bluetooth on Friday May 24, 2013 @03:26AM
(#5761620)
The best part is that current tax code means Apple earning investment income through AOI is actually legal. Apple has paid their taxes and is playing by the rules - yet Levin is still upset.
Edit: I would appreciate it if someone told me what I said was incorrect or wrong in anyway.
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by k__ on Friday May 24, 2013 @03:56AM
(#5761694)
Sounds like this for me.
They make profit in different countries, pay there taxes there and then put the whole money where it doesn't cost taxes. Why not?
In my opinion they should spend the money as they get it, but if they didn't I don't care HOW they didn't...
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by venomsnake on Friday May 24, 2013 @03:55AM
(#5761689)
Because you made a slight typo. You wrote the best when you obviously meant the worst.
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by bluetooth on Friday May 24, 2013 @04:03AM
(#5761709)
Guess conveying sarcasm over the internet is not one of my strengths. I suppose I meant more of a "your tax code allows this type of activity, yet you are still surprised it happens" type message.
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by manicdee on Friday May 24, 2013 @04:38AM
(#5761820)
Give the guy a break, he was clearly educated in the USA.
Re: Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billio...
by venomsnake on Friday May 24, 2013 @06:03AM
(#5762001)
Not at all. Just poe's law in action http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poes_law. If any of the discourse team are reading this - sarcasm/intention tag will be much appreciated.
Didn't they just answer themselves!