Honest question -- is it conceivable that the work is never "fixed" on some physical medium? Years ago, I thought "internet law" was a silly concept -- but as in the case above, the letter of the law might not be enough to support the spirit of the law.
Re:Hacker News is depressing
by itsybitsycoder on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @04:03PM
(#5746474)
Hard drives are a physical medium.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fixed_in_a_tangible_medium_of...
But is memcached on RAM?
Re:Hacker News is depressing
by itsybitsycoder on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @06:41PM
(#5747510)
I'm not super familiar with memcached, but either memcached on RAM "is sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration", or memcached is talking to a persistent database (i.e., HDD) in the background. Because I can read posts on that blog that are over a year old.
Re:Hacker News is depressing
by roguecoder on Wednesday May 22, 2013 @08:31AM
(#5750279)
The recent Blizzard case found that making a copy of something into RAM created a fixed copy of it, I believe.
Remember, intellectual property rights are all thought-crime laws. They don't have to make sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright