\d less efficient than [0-9]

Re:\d less efficient than [0-9] by jeltz on Sunday May 19, 2013 @06:22PM (#5734647)

Happens in Perl but not ruby or PostgreSQL.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:\d less efficient than [0-9] by pfedor on Monday May 20, 2013 @02:30PM (#5739123)

Doesn't happen in Perl for me:

  pfedor@Pawels-iMac:~$ perl -ne 'print "Digit!\n" if /\d/'
  af
  3
  Digit!
  23fa3
  Digit!
  asdf
  ١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩۰۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹
  ৩৪৫৬৭৮৯੦੧੨੩੪੫੬੭੮੯૦૧૨૩૪૫
  ୧୨୩୪୫୬୭୮
  ౨౩౪౫౬౭౮౯೦೧೨೩೪೫೬೭೮೯൦൧൨൩൪൫൬൭൮൯๐๑๒๓๔๕๖๗๘๙໐໑໒໓
  234
  Digit!

(perl from Macports and perl from /usr/bin/perl behave the same in this respect.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:\d less efficient than [0-9] by xonea on Monday May 20, 2013 @06:18PM (#5740486)

You have to tell to interpret stdin as UTF-8 (flag -C) - then it works: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5734641

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:\d less efficient than [0-9] by pfedor on Monday May 20, 2013 @10:06PM (#5741490)

Good to know, thanks.

I'd argue that perl gets it right--as the default behavior, this behavior would gravely violate the principle of least surprise, but for the 0.01% of people who want \d to match ੧, there's no harm to making it available as an option you need to specifically request.

[ Parent | on HN ]