News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Skype backdoor confirmation by rbanffy on Saturday May 18, 2013 @08:18AM (#5728649)
Readable is one thing. Read and used is a completely different thing.
Re:Skype backdoor confirmation by glurgh on Saturday May 18, 2013 @10:50AM (#5729106)
Is it? Gmail reads and uses all mail and this doesn't seem to have generated a great outburst of controversy.
Re:Skype backdoor confirmation by rbanffy on Saturday May 18, 2013 @11:04AM (#5729157)
Yeah, right.

While both Skype and Gmail store your messages (if you Skype across multiple devices, you'll see logs of conversations that happened on different devices), I don't think Gmail probes every URL you send in your messages. Also, SMTP is not always done under SSL, so, privacy cannot be assured.

But that's easily testable. I'll get back to you in a couple hours.

Re:Skype backdoor confirmation by alfaomega on Saturday May 18, 2013 @11:53AM (#5729297)
I am struggling to under the distinction you're trying to portray.

One automatically scans your email to show related ads, another does a HTTP HEAD request to URLs for only the server headers, which they say is for malware scanning purposes. Both are automated jobs.

See my other post to see how Google employees have access to all your email, documents, chat transcripts, Google Voice calls, Youtube videos etc. and how a few abused it to stalk teens.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5728707

As usual, Google gets a free pass and Microsoft gets demonized(they should stop claiming it's end to end encrypted, though). Looking at your HN profile, it's not hard to understand why. Thanks for being honest about disliking Microsoft but please try not to let that color your objective opinions and playing favorites regardless of facts.

Re:Skype backdoor confirmation by rbanffy on Saturday May 18, 2013 @12:15PM (#5729397)
Did Google ever release a Skype Man video?