Re:'Brave' creator blasts Disney for 'blatant sexism' in pri...
by sp332 on Monday May 13, 2013 @02:57PM
(#5700660)
I don't think the photo they show is very clear. The waist is now impossibly thin, the boobs are more up-front and perky. Also the dress is not just pretty but sultry, which seems inappropriate for a young girl (this character especially). I don't know if you've seen the movie, but the character specifically acts against conventions that don't suit her. Dressing her up this way implies that the style suits her, and her creator disagrees.
Re:'Brave' creator blasts Disney for 'blatant sexism' in pri...
by mixmastamyk on Monday May 13, 2013 @04:22PM
(#5701146)
I did a google search and found some other pictures. It's true, she's a touch more conventionally attractive, but the rendering seems pretty conservative to me. In the realm of having her fit in with the others, artistic license, etc.
Teenage girls actually do have shoulders and breasts and the original seems to have neither.
Re:'Brave' creator blasts Disney for 'blatant sexism' in pri...
by sp332 on Monday May 13, 2013 @05:07PM
(#5701415)
I think the problem with the new version is that it's too specifically designed to be attractive to men at the expense of every other aspect of the character.
Re:'Brave' creator blasts Disney for 'blatant sexism' in pri...
by zdean on Monday May 13, 2013 @02:57PM
(#5700664)
"we all have obligations to society"
How is it that you cringe when friends get your daughter princess gifts but feel your daughter has a social obligation to (at times) act like a princess whether she likes it or not?
Re:'Brave' creator blasts Disney for 'blatant sexism' in pri...
by mixmastamyk on Monday May 13, 2013 @04:07PM
(#5701084)
She's 4. If she were invited to a royal ball (at the appropriate age) I would expect (but not force) her to wear a pretty gown.
Of course being a princess invited to a royal ball is not a frequent situation, so I don't want her spending much time focusing on it. In short, it isn't wrong just unrealistic.
There is some overlap and conflicting priorities there, I agree. Hence the itchiness.
So I tend to understand the aggravation of the author. But, it feels like an over-reaction here (though it may be the article's tone). I didn't feel outraged despite the article and comments here expecting/demanding me to be.
I had to look hard at the picture. Looks like they threw Merida in the bathtub, and put her in a nice dress and eye-color for the "ball." But, when the Princesses get together that's how they get dressed up, for a party, no? Evening wear is expected and appropriate in that situation. Is Merida supposed to show up for the Oscars in riding-chaps and bow?
If this is the only representation of Merida from now on, I'd agree with the anger. But, even tomboys would dress up for a ball, even if they felt a bit itchy. They would get a lot of compliments too. That's how the world works, folks. Men have to fit into expectations too--the suit/tuxedo is ridiculous at < 35 degrees latitude.
So, I feel no outrage for her to have a bit of range. From the fox-hunt to the royal ball. Even if she'd be a bit uncomfortable, we all have obligations to society.