News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by DanBC on Saturday May 11, 2013 @11:58AM (#5690993)
This is a baffling opinion to have on HN.
Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by cturner on Saturday May 11, 2013 @12:37PM (#5691141)
There's plenty of precedent. The plan9 guys were very explicit about not having variable colours in acme. The suckless.org team say that you can configure whatever you like, but only through changing the source code. BeOS aimed to have no configuration and good defaults.

I'd rather have something that was well thought through and is internally consistant than a grab-bag of customisation, none of which coexists well - like most linux desktops.

Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by Joeboy on Saturday May 11, 2013 @01:04PM (#5691237)
I'm not baffled. Giving people fewer options seems like a pretty popular paradigm these days. We tried "Give people choice" in the '90s and '00s, and it turned out people were mostly unimpressed. "Opinionated software" is the paradigm du jour.