News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by keithpeter on Saturday May 11, 2013 @11:42AM (#5690940)
"If it was the only terminal emulator, there would be a good reason."

Gnome Terminal may (effectively) be the only terminal emulator available to you if you do not have rights to install software or to change default software.

Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by jodrellblank on Saturday May 11, 2013 @01:51PM (#5691383)
If you are in an environment where you have to take what you are given, then whinging to the software developers to add in the functionality your boss won't let you have seems like the wrong move.
Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by mpyne on Saturday May 11, 2013 @03:02PM (#5691702)
Yes, you're right. They should apparently be whining to their boss to use something other than GNOME instead instead of trying to fix their work environment at the source.
Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by jodrellblank on Saturday May 11, 2013 @03:31PM (#5691815)
I'm assuming the said boss would not have approved the update to GNOME without first checking that all the features they require the workforce to have in order to work, are present.

Then yes, they should.

If the boss gives you lemons, you don't go to the lemon tree and ask if it can make lemons that read email, browse NFS shares and change screensaver settings. You go to your boss and say "just-lemons isn't good enough".

Re:Bug 698544 – Background configuration is missing in termi... by vacri on Sunday May 12, 2013 @02:41AM (#5693391)
When you cook, do you just give people a bowl of nutrient paste, saying "that's all you need to remain functional"? But we'd like something with texture and flavour. "So what, it's not like those things are needed to be functional. You can get by without them."